4.7 Article

Impact of Quasi-Idealized Future Land Cover Scenarios at High Latitudes in Complex Terrain

Journal

EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020EF001838

Keywords

afforestation; convection permitting; high latitudes; land use land cover change; regional climate; WRF

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [268243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Afforestation is gaining popularity as a climate mitigation policy, but the impacts on local-to-regional climate in high latitudes like Norway are complex. Different forestry scenarios in Norway lead to additional warming in winter and spring, and cooling in summer. Current afforestation policies may partially mitigate the effects of global warming but also exacerbate some locally.
Afforestation is gaining popularity as a climate mitigation policy in many countries, including high latitude regions such as Norway. However, the impacts of afforestation on local-to-regional climate is poorly understood. This study uses the Weather Research and Forecasting model to investigate the biogeophysical impacts of different forestry scenarios on the local-to-regional climate of Norway. The forestry scenarios considered are the conversion of open spaces to either evergreen forest by active afforestation or to mixed forest by natural succession. Results show both forestry scenarios lead to additional warming of surface temperatures in winter and spring (between 1.0 degrees C and 1.5 degrees C) and cooling in summer (between -1.6 degrees C and -1.3 degrees C). A temperature decomposition analysis shows that the warming in winter and spring is driven by surface albedo changes while summer cooling is driven by changes in sensible heat fluxes for afforestation and surface albedo for natural succession. Maximum 2 m air temperature increases considerably in spring in both forestry scenarios (similar to 0.8 degrees C to 1.0 degrees C). Analysis of precipitation, multiple climate indices and extremes, reveal little or no response to the different forestry scenarios. The largest societally relevant response to the forestry scenarios is the partial mitigation of the reduction in snow days expected from global warming by 10-20 days. This suggests that implementing current afforestation policies for climate mitigation in Norway may adversely exacerbate some effects of global warming locally while mitigating others. As such, the impacts of afforestation on the local-to-regional climate at high latitudes are complex and cannot support or dismiss afforestation as a climate mitigation policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available