4.6 Article

Intranasal drug delivery: opportunities and toxicologic challenges during drug development

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 735-757

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-020-00891-5

Keywords

Intranasal drug delivery; Olfactory pathways; Nose-to-brain-delivery; Nasal toxicity

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. AbbVie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in intranasal drug delivery in pharmaceutical R&D. This review article highlights the advantages of nasal delivery for local and systemic drug delivery, as well as for CNS indications, compared to conventional systemic approaches. However, formulation limitations and toxicological considerations remain areas that need further optimization in this field.
Over the past 10 years, the interest in intranasal drug delivery in pharmaceutical R&D has increased. This review article summarises information on intranasal administration for local and systemic delivery, as well as for CNS indications. Nasal delivery offers many advantages over standard systemic delivery systems, such as its non-invasive character, a fast onset of action and in many cases reduced side effects due to a more targeted delivery. There are still formulation limitations and toxicological aspects to be optimised. Intranasal drug delivery in the field of drug development is an interesting delivery route for the treatment of neurological disorders. Systemic approaches often fail to efficiently supply the CNS with drugs. This review paper describes the anatomical, histological and physiological basis and summarises currently approved drugs for administration via intranasal delivery. Further, the review focuses on toxicological considerations of intranasally applied compounds and discusses formulation aspects that need to be considered for drug development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available