4.6 Article

Correlating Natural, Dry, and Saturated Ultrasonic Pulse Velocities with the Mechanical Properties of Rock for Various Sample Diameters

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10249134

Keywords

correlation; ultrasonic pulse velocity; natural P-wave velocity; dry P-wave velocity; saturated P-wave velocity; mechanical property; sample diameter; limestone

Funding

  1. United Arab Emirates University, Research Affairs under a SURE 2016 grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Featured Application The ultrasonic pulse velocity test is a widely used, inexpensive, nondestructive, and modest test to define the dynamic properties of rocks in various geotechnical and mining engineering applications as well as in gas and oil explorations under various environmental conditions. P-wave velocity is employed in various fields of engineering to estimate the mechanical properties of rock, as its measurement is reliable, convenient, rapid, nondestructive, and economical. The present study aimed to (i) correlate natural, dry, and saturated P-wave velocities with the mechanical properties of limestone and (ii) investigate how the ultrasonic P-wave velocities and mechanical properties of limestone are affected by the sample diameter. This study reveals that P-wave velocities under different environmental conditions can be correlated with the mechanical properties of limestone. Further, the R-value variations with different P-wave velocities for a given sample diameter are (i) negligible in terms of the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) excluding 63.2 mm, (ii) limited for the diametrical point load index (PLID) except for 53.9 mm, (iii) perceived in case of the axial point load index (PLIA) for 47.7 mm, (iv) observed for the indirect tensile strength (ITS), but generally insignificant, and (v) detected in terms of Schmidt hammer value (SHV) except for 47.7 mm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available