4.1 Article

Evaluating the stormwater management model to improve urban water allocation system in drought conditions

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1514-1524

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2021.027

Keywords

landscape system; surface and subsurface flows; water planning; water scarcity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a combination model based on stormwater management and environment landscape system to improve urban water allocation system and increase water productivity under drought conditions. By analyzing data and simulating subsurface flow behavior, a real-time plan for restoring the ELS was designed, demonstrating the applicability and feasibility of the model in cities with water shortages.
Improving the urban water allocation system has depended on different technical and managerial components. One of the main solutions for increasing the available capacity is the predetermined plan for constructing a water circulation system to restore the existing water resources. For this objective, a combination model was conducted based on a stormwater management technique and environment landscape system (ELS) under drought conditions. A hydrological framework was established using the long-term meteorological information in central China to estimate the extreme values of surface water in each stress period. A data analysis system was generated at three meteorological points of the study area and the developed model was incorporated to simulate the behavior of the subsurface flow. Consequently, a growth simulation model was designed according to the soil structure and vegetation canopy cover to formulate a real-time plan for the restoration of ELS. Results showed that the proposed model could improve the water productivity in urban and environment consumptions. Furthermore, technical analysis confirmed the suitability and applicability of the developed plan in cities with water shortages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available