4.6 Article

Effects of Cryopreservation on Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Assessing Drug Safety Response Profiles

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 168-181

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.11.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [17MERIT3361009]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund [IRSA 1015009]
  3. Leducq Fondation [18CVD05]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL130020, R01 HL133272]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that recovered hiPSC-CMs from cryopreservation showed upregulation of cell cycle genes and altered response to drugs, indicating an increased propensity for drug-induced cardiac arrhythmic events.
Burgeoning applications of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) in disease modeling, regenerative medicine, and drug screening have broadened the usage of hiPSC-CMs and entailed their long-term storage. Cryopreservation is the most common approach to store hiPSC-CMs. However, the effects of cryopreservation and recovery on hiPSC-CMs remain poorly understood. Here, we characterized the transcriptome, electro-mechanical function, and drug response of fresh hiPSC-CMs without cryopreservation and recovered hiPSC-CMs from cryopreservation. We found that recovered hiPSC-CMs showed upregulation of cell cycle genes, similar or reduced contractility, Ca2+ transients, and field potential duration. When subjected to treatment of drugs that affect electrophysiological properties, recovered hiPSC-CMs showed an altered drug response and enhanced propensity for drug induced cardiac arrhythmic events. In conclusion, fresh and recovered hiPSC-CMs do not always show comparable molecular and physiological properties. When cryopreserved hiPSC-CMs are used for assessing drug-induced cardiac liabilities, the altered drug sensitivity needs to be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available