4.6 Article

Experimental lung injury induces cerebral cytokine mRNA production in pigs

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10471

Keywords

Critical care; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Cognitive impairment; Cerebral inflammation; Cytokines; Lung injury; Pigs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an important disease with a high incidence among patients admitted to intensive care units. Over the last decades, the survival of critically ill patients has improved; however, cognitive deficits are among the long-term sequelae. We hypothesize that acute lung injury leads to upregulation of cerebral cytokine synthesis. Methods. After approval of the institutional and animal care committee, 20 male pigs were randomized to one of three groups: (1) Lung injury by oleic acid injection (OAI), (2) ventilation only (CTR) or (3) untreated. We compared neuronal numbers, proportion of neurons with markers for apoptosis, activation state of Iba-1 stained microglia cells and cerebral mRNA levels of different cytokines between the groups 18 hours after onset of lung injury. Results. Wefound an increase in hippocampal TNFalpha (p< 0 :05) and IL-6 (p< 0 :05) messenger RNA (mRNA) in the OAI compared to untreated group as well as higher hippocampal IL-6 mRNA compared to control (p< 0:05). IL-8 and IL-1beta mRNA showed no differences between the groups. We found histologic markers for beginning apoptosis in OAI compared to untreated (p< 0 :05) and more active microglia cells in OAI and CTR compared to untreated (p< 0 :001 each). Conclusion. Hippocampal cytokine transcription increases within 18 hours after the induction of acute lung injury with histological evidence of neuronal damage. It remains to be elucidated if increased cytokine mRNA synthesis plays a role in the cognitive decline observed in survivors of ARDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available