4.4 Article

Gold standard susceptibility testing of fosfomycin in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales using a new agar dilution panel

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 334-337

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.08.025

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; Enterobacterales; Fosfomycin; Agar dilution; Commercial AD panel

Funding

  1. National research grant Piano per la ricerca 2016-2018-Linea di intervento 2. University of Catania (I)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Many clinical laboratories have difficulty in routinely performing in vitro fosfomycin susceptibility testing using the agar dilution (AD) method, considered to be the gold standard method. The objective of our work was to evaluate a rapid commercial fosfomycin agar dilution panel against clinical Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacterales strains, in two different centres located in Italy and in the UK. Methods: A total of 99 Enterobacterales (mostly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 80 S. aureus clinical isolates was used to evaluate the commercial device, a 12-well panel containing fosfomycin incorporated into CA-MH agar supplemented with 25 mg/L of glucose-6-phosphate (Liofilchem S.r.I., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). Testing was performed in two centres (Italy and UK) and kit results were compared against the gold standard in-house AD MIC method. Results: According to the EUCAST breakpoints, fosfomycin inhibited 61% of the S. aureus strains, and 76% of the Enterobacterales isolates tested by the AD reference method. There was a Categorical Agreement (CA) of 100% and an Essential Agreement (EA) of 91.25% for S. aureus; while the Enterobacterales strains showed a CA of 94% and an EA of 97%. No evaluation errors were observed among S. aureus, while 5% Major Error and 1% Very Major Error were observed for the Enterobacterales. Conclusions: Our results confirmed the feasibility of determining fosfomycin susceptibility using a commercial AD panel as a routine substitution for the AD test. The few differences observed were only in strains with MICs around the breakpoint used. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available