4.7 Review

Research Advance on Qingfei Paidu Decoction in Prescription Principle, Mechanism Analysis and Clinical Application

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.589714

Keywords

qingfei paidu decoction; novel coronavirus pneumonia; prescription principle; mechanism analysis; clinical application

Funding

  1. National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2020ZYLCYJ02-3]
  2. Sichuan Administration of traditional Chinese Medicine [2020yj018, 2020yj024]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M683365]
  4. National Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research Base [(2020)33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights the latest advances of Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPDD) in the treatment of COVID-19, including traditional Chinese medicine theory, mechanism analysis, clinical application, and future perspectives, as well as discussing valuable issues and possible research directions.
Since the sudden epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine immediately organized experts to formulate and screen the effective prescriptions of traditional Chinese medicine according to the characteristics of the novel coronavirus infection. Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPDD) has been proven to be effective in multi-provincial clinical trials, and has been selected as a general prescription for the treatment of COVID-19 in different stages that was later promoted to be used nationwide. This review highlights the latest advances of QFPDD, focusing on the TCM theory, mechanism analysis, clinical application of QFPDD and its future perspectives. Moreover, an in-depth discussion of some valuable issues and possible development for future research on QFPDD is also discussed, aiming to provide a novel guide to combat the global epidemic COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available