4.5 Article

Effect of Electrolyte Composition and Concentration on Pulsed Potential Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Journal

CHEMELECTROCHEM
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 681-688

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.202001445

Keywords

CO2; copper; electrocatalysis; interface; pulsed potential

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET1805400]
  2. CESI-Corning Graduate Fellowship
  3. Cornell University Robert F. Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
  4. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  5. Cornell University Department of Chemical Engineering McMullen Fellowship
  6. Capes, Brazil [13159/13-5]
  7. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-1120296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between electrolyte concentration/composition and product distribution for pulsed potential electrochemical CO2 reduction (eCO(2)R) differs from that of constant potential eCO(2)R. Pulsed potential eCO(2)R suppresses H-2 formation relative to CH4 due to periodic desorption of surface protons, while constant potential eCO(2)R favors H-2 production. Increasing KCl concentration during pulsed potential eCO(2)R greatly enhances C-2 product formation.
With rising CO2 emissions and growing interests towards CO2 valorization, electrochemical CO2 reduction (eCO(2)R) has emerged as a promising prospect for carbon recycling and chemical energy storage. Yet, product selectivity and electrocatalyst longevity persist as obstacles to the broad implementation of eCO(2)R. A possible solution to ameliorate this challenge is to pulse the applied potential. However, it is currently unclear whether and how the trends and lessons obtained from the more conventional constant potential eCO(2)R translate to pulsed potential eCO(2)R. In this work, we report that the relationship between electrolyte concentration/composition and product distribution for pulsed potential eCO(2)R is different from constant potential eCO(2)R. In the case of constant potential eCO(2)R, increasing KHCO3 concentration favors the formation of H-2 and CH4. In contrast, for pulsed potential eCO(2)R, H-2 formation is suppressed due to the periodic desorption of surface protons, while CH4 is still favored. In the case of KCl, increasing the concentration during constant potential eCO(2)R does not affect product distribution, mainly producing H-2 and CO. However, increasing KCl concentration during pulsed potential eCO(2)R persistently suppresses H-2 formation and greatly favors C-2 products, reaching 71 % Faradaic efficiency. Collectively, these results provide new mechanistic insights into the pulsed eCO(2)R mechanism within the context of proton-donator ability and ionic conductivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available