4.5 Article

Preparation and characterization of chars and activated carbons from wood wastes

Journal

CARBON LETTERS
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 941-956

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s42823-020-00205-2

Keywords

Activated carbon; Wood wastes; Northern hardwood pins-fines; Wood dust; Vacuum pyrolysis; Vacuum gasification; CO2

Funding

  1. USDA Forest Service [19-JV-11111124-053, 19-JV-11111124-063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activated carbons with high surface area and pore volume can be produced from wood waste through vacuum CO2 pyrolysis/gasification process. The optimized conditions are 800 degrees C, heating rate of 20 degrees C/min, and holding time of 2 h. The prepared products were characterized using nitrogen physisorption, SEM, and FTIR to detect changes in surface functional groups at different stages of preparation.
Preparation of activated carbons from wood waste including northern hardwood pins-fines and wood dust was conducted and then compared through the following methods: physical pyrolysis and CO2 activation, vacuum pyrolysis and CO2 activation, CO2 gasification, and vacuum CO2 gasification processes. Experimental results show that chars and activated carbons with high surface area and pore volume are produced from wood waste through a vacuum CO2 pyrolysis/gasification process. The effects of operation variables of vacuum pyrolysis/gasification on the properties of chars and activated carbons were investigated to identify and optimize the temperature, heating time, and heating rate. The optimized vacuum CO2 gasification conditions were found to be a temperature of 800 degrees C, a heating rate of 20 degrees C/min, and a holding time of 2 h respectively. The prepared wood-chars and activated carbons were characterized by nitrogen physisorption, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra determined any changes in the surface functional groups produced during different preparation stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available