4.5 Article

Reduced Snow Cover Increases Wintertime Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Emissions from an Agricultural Soil in the Upper US Midwest

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 917-927

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-016-0077-9

Keywords

nitrous oxide (N2O); snow cover; freeze-thaw cycles; soil nitrogen; soil aggregates; automated chambers; greenhouse gases; climate change

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy's Office of Science [DE-FCO2-07ER64494]
  2. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-ACO5-76RL01830]
  3. US National Science Foundation LTER Program [DEB 1027253]
  4. MSU AgBioResearch
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1027253] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Throughout most of the northern hemisphere, snow cover decreased in almost every winter month from 1967 to 2012. Because snow is an effective insulator, snow cover loss has likely enhanced soil freezing and the frequency of soil freeze-thaw cycles, which can disrupt soil nitrogen dynamics including the production of nitrous oxide (N2O). We used replicated automated gas flux chambers deployed in an annual cropping system in the upper Midwest US for three winters (December-March, 2011-2013) to examine the effects of snow removal and additions on N2O fluxes. Diminished snow cover resulted in increased N2O emissions each year; over the entire experiment, cumulative emissions in plots with snow removed were 69% higher than in ambient snow control plots and 95% higher than in plots that received additional snow (P < 0.001). Higher emissions coincided with a greater number of freeze-thaw cycles that broke up soil macroaggregates (250-8000 A mu m) and significantly increased soil inorganic nitrogen pools. We conclude that winters with less snow cover can be expected to accelerate N2O fluxes from agricultural soils subject to wintertime freezing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available