4.5 Review

Long-term misdiagnosis and neurologic outcomes of thallium poisoning: A case report and literature review

Journal

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2032

Keywords

long-term follow-up; neuroelectrophysiology: toxicity; neurologic outcome; thallium poisoning

Funding

  1. High-level Hospital Construction Research Project of Maoming People's Hospital [(2018) 413]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thallium poisoning is a rare but potentially deadly condition that is often misdiagnosed. Correct diagnosis can be achieved through blood and urine tests, with neurological damage being the main long-term sequelae in affected patients.
Introduction: Thallium poisoning is a rare occurrence. Therefore, thallium poisoning is easily misdiagnosed and is often accompanied by a series of serious sequelae and can even result in death in severe cases. Here, we report long-term follow-up of a case of a patient who was poisoned with thallium on two separate occasions. Methods: A 43-year-old man was initially misdiagnosed as gastroenteritis, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) within 21 months. The correct diagnosis was confirmed by blood and urine thallium assays. After Prussian blue treatment, thallium was undetectable in the blood by day 60. Following this investigation, a criminal suspect confessed to two instances of adulterating thallium sulfate in the patient's beverage. A 6-year follow-up was performed after discharge, and a comprehensive literature was review. Results: We found that the original gastrointestinal symptoms, skin lesions, and hair loss were reversed and had recovered, except for residual neurologic damage, even with long-term rehabilitation. Discussion: Thallium intoxication may have been initially identified if neurologic symptoms had occurred concurrently with gastrointestinal and cutaneous symptoms. Neurologic damage represented the main sequelae of thallium poisoning in our present case report.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available