4.6 Article

Gradient Index Devices for Terahertz Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons

Journal

ACS PHOTONICS
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 5305-5312

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01323

Keywords

spoof surface plasmon polaritons; terahertz devices; plasmonics; gradient-index optics; surface waves

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61805129, 11874245, 61875150, 61935015, 11974259, 61775159, 62005193, 62075158]
  2. Applied Basic Research Project of ShanXi Province [201801D221161]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shanxi Province [201903D121026, 201903D121071]
  4. Applied Basic Research Project of Datong City [2018148]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020TQ0224, 2020M680877]
  6. Tianjin Municipal Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [18JCJQJC45600]
  7. KAUST Office of Sponsored Research [URF-2950CRG5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Terahertz electromagnetic fields can be well confined and propagate at structured metal surfaces, known as spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs). Recent demonstrations of terahertz SSPP waveguides have attracted much attention for their potential in developing ultracompact plasmonic circuits. However, further progress has been hampered by the lack of complex and high-performance devices that can flexibly manipulate the propagation of terahertz SSPPs. Here we demonstrate several terahertz gradient index SSPP devices using metallic pillar structures. The devices are realized by engineering the geometric parameters of each metallic pillar to achieve the desired local mode index for the terahertz SSPPs. The performance of these SSPP devices is experimentally characterized using scanning near-field terahertz microscopy. The versatility of the presented design scheme would provide a platform for the design and fabrication of high-performance plasmonic devices, especially cascadable ones in practical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available