4.6 Article

Simulation Study of Dynamic Bus Lane Concept

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13031302

Keywords

dynamic bus lanes; transport modelling; public transport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the methodology and calibration process for dynamic bus lane (DBL) modeling, comparing it to standard exclusive bus lane (XBL) in four selected sites in Rzeszow, Poland. Results show that DBL can provide similar benefits to public transport with only a slight increase in private travel times compared to XBL, making it a promising option for improving transport efficiency.
Not many publications are available on using microsimulation models to analyze the feasibility of implementing the dynamic bus lane (DBL) concept. The paper presents the methodology and calibration process used for DBL modeling. For the selected four sites in Rzeszow (Poland), three options were analyzed: no bus lane, standard exclusive bus lane (XBL), and dynamic bus lane. The analyses were carried out using PTV Vissim software with an additional logic script to control the DBL activation. Simulation model parameters were calibrated using a genetic algorithm. The final assessment of individual options was based on the weighted average travel time for all transport modes. The results show that the dynamic bus lane could bring the same benefits to public transport and cause only a slight increase in travel times in private transport compared to XBL. The XBL solution, depending on the site, led to increasing the average travel time in private transport by 12% to 25%, while the dynamic bus lane increased by 1% to 12%. Weighted average travel time per person is proposed as the overall indicator of efficiency. Preliminary analyses show that the bus volume, bus occupancy, routing, and traffic conditions will affect the efficiency of the new solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available