4.6 Article

Urban Sustainability and Natural Hazards Management; Designs Using Simulations

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13020649

Keywords

simulations; urban sustainability; natural hazards; gamification; environmental sciences degree

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Speaking of the topic of sustainability, it involves significant implications reflected by the SDGs set forth in the 2030 Agenda. The study verifies the necessity of resilience in cities against natural hazards for sustainable development. The research explores training experts in prevention and control of risks, and the potential of gamification in environmental education and NH management has been demonstrated.
Sustainability is a topic with deep implications, as reflected by the approval of the 2030 Agenda for the sustainable development that has 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). One of these SDGs tries to achieve the sustainability of cities, for which we have verified that their resilience is necessary against natural hazards (NH). For the persistence of NH through time on a world scale, it is crucial to train expert technicians in the prevention and control of these risks. For this research, two studies have been made, one focused on research into the training of environmentalists by means of gamification, and the other to verify the potential of this same tool in the NH analysis and management. With this work we have been able to verify that the model of city designed can be an alternative and more sustainable model to the current solutions, also corroborating the usefulness of simulation in their design and its role in the resilience against NH. On the other hand, in relation to the teaching of the subject under study, based on the competences studied, this study is considered successful, demonstrating the utility of gamification and simulations in the formation of environmentalists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available