4.6 Article

Plutonium-Doped Monazite and Other Orthophosphates-Thermodynamics and Experimental Data on Long-Term Behavior

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13031203

Keywords

plutonium; monazite; rhabdophane; orthophosphate; radiolysis; nuclear waste

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [075-15-2020-782]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that actinide-doped monazite is prone to the formation of mechanically weak, poorly crystalline crust, presumably consisting of rhabdophane. For light rare earth elements, the plutonium admixture is preferentially redistributed into rhabdophane in the case of monazite, xenotime, and rhabdophane structural types.
The paper consists of two main parts: a microscopic and spectroscopic investigation of the single crystal of 17-year-old Pu-238-doped Eu-monazite, and a theoretical calculation of the properties of several structural types of orthophosphates. It is shown that actinide-doped monazite is prone to the formation of mechanically weak, poorly crystalline crust, presumably consisting of rhabdophane. Its formation is likely promoted by the formation of peroxides and, potentially, acidic compounds, due to the radiolysis of atmospheric moisture. The calculations of mixing the enthalpies and Gibbs energies of binary solid solutions of Pu and rare earth element (REE) phosphates that were performed for the principal structural types-monazite, xenotime, rhabdophane-show that, in the case of light REEs, the plutonium admixture is preferentially redistributed into the rhabdophane. This process strongly affects the behavior of actinides, leached from a monazite-based waste form. The applications of these results for the development of actinide waste forms are discussed. The current data on the behavior of real actinide-doped monazite suggest that this type of ceramic waste form is not very resistant, even in relatively short time periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available