4.6 Article

Priority Stakeholders' Perception: Social Responsibility Indicators

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13031034

Keywords

social responsibility; composite indicators; philanthropic higher education organizations; legitimacy; priority stakeholders

Funding

  1. CAPES-Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination
  2. FAPERGS-Rio Grande do Sul State Research Support Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to build a list of composite indicators for the assessment of philanthropic higher education organizations' social responsibility based on stakeholder interests. Through literature review, stakeholder surveys, and analysis, composite indicators were extracted to evaluate the performance of PHEOs social responsibility considering the stakeholders' interests.
This study aims to build a list of composite indicators by information that enable the assessment of philanthropic higher education organizations' (PHEOs) social responsibility based on the interests of their stakeholders. A list of 88 social responsibility indicators was built based on a literature review and stakeholder interest to serve as a basis for the composite indicators. In order to identify and validate the indicators, field research was carried out. Stakeholders from Brazil and the United Kingdom scored them from one (not important) to five (very important) for each indicator identified in the literature review. With 540 valid answers, they suggested inclusions and exclusions according to their interests. Next, a correlation analysis was performed to identify and eliminate redundant indicators. The principal component analysis extracted the composite indicators. The results point to 11 principal components that are configured as composite indicators to evaluate the performance of PHEOs social responsibility considering the stakeholder's interests, a factor that differentiates this research from the literature revision done. Some of the composite indicators are close to the social responsibility categories reviewed in the literature. However, others show more specific and in-depth interests, especially regarding the stakeholders themselves. These composite indicators help managers establish disclosure policies whenever they are focused on seeking legitimacy in the social context of PHEOs. It also contributes to the advancement of theoretical knowledge, presenting composite indicators, from the stakeholder's perspective, for the disclosure of social responsibility of PHEOs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available