4.8 Review

Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 992-1006

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12624

Keywords

Data bias; data deficiency; data uncertainty; Global Biodiversity Information Facility; Global Strategy for Plant Conservation; herbarium specimens; knowledge gaps; species distributions; survey effort; Wallacean shortfall

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU)
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  3. Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plants are a hyperdiverse clade that plays a key role in maintaining ecological and evolutionary processes as well as human livelihoods. Biases, gaps and uncertainties in plant occurrence information remain a central problem in ecology and conservation, but these limitations remain largely unassessed globally. In this synthesis, we propose a conceptual framework for analysing gaps in information coverage, information uncertainties and biases in these metrics along taxonomic, geographical and temporal dimensions, and apply it to all c. 370000 species of land plants. To this end, we integrated 120million point-occurrence records with independent databases on plant taxonomy, distributions and conservation status. We find that different data limitations are prevalent in each dimension. Different metrics of information coverage and uncertainty are largely uncorrelated, and reducing taxonomic, spatial or temporal uncertainty by filtering out records would usually come at great costs to coverage. In light of these multidimensional data limitations, we discuss prospects for global plant ecological and biogeographical research, monitoring and conservation and outline critical next steps towards more effective information usage and mobilisation. Our study provides an empirical baseline for evaluating and improving global floristic knowledge, along with a conceptual framework that can be applied to study other hyperdiverse clades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available