4.8 Article

The effects of asymmetric competition on the life history of Trinidadian guppies

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 268-278

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12563

Keywords

Asymmetrical competition; contest competition; integral projection model; interaction surface; mesocosm; scramble competition; symmetrical competition

Categories

Funding

  1. USA NSF FIBR [EF0623632]
  2. UK NERC [ATR00350]
  3. ERC
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I022027/1, NE/K014048/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/I022027/1, NE/K014048/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1258231] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology [1258231] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [GRANTS:13741189] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of asymmetric interactions on population dynamics has been widely investigated, but there has been little work aimed at understanding how life history parameters like generation time, life expectancy and the variance in lifetime reproductive success are impacted by different types of competition. We develop a new framework for incorporating trait-mediated density-dependence into size-structured models and use Trinidadian guppies to show how different types of competitive interactions impact life history parameters. Our results show the degree of symmetry in competitive interactions can have dramatic effects on the speed of the life history. For some vital rates, shifting the competitive superiority from small to large individuals resulted in a doubling of the generation time. Such large influences of competitive symmetry on the timescale of demographic processes, and hence evolution, highlights the interwoven nature of ecological and evolutionary processes and the importance of density-dependence in understanding eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available