4.6 Article

Direct experimental detection of hydrogen radicals in non-oxidative methane catalytic reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 372-376

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.04.001

Keywords

Non-oxidative methane conversion; Catalytic Fe-reactor; H radical; Experimental detection; Methane activation

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB10020202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21621063, 21425312, 21761132035]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0403402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides experimental evidence for the formation of hydrogen radicals during the MTOAH reaction, confirming their enhancing effects on overall performance. The cofeeding of benzene as a hydrogen donor also contributes to additional methane activation pathways alongside catalytic activation.
Non-oxidative conversion of methane to olefins, aromatics and hydrogen (MTOAH) has been reported recently over metal single sites such as iron and platinum. The reaction was proposed to involve catalytic activation of methane followed by gas phase C-C coupling of methyl radicals. This study using H atom Rydberg Tagging time-of-flight technique provides direct experimental evidence for the formation of hydrogen radicals during MTOAH reaction over a catalytic quartz wall reactor containing embedded iron species (denoted as Fe-reactor). Fe-reactor gives 7.3% methane conversion at 1273 K with 41.2% selectivity toward C-2 (ethane, ethylene and acetylene) and 31.8% toward BTX (benzene, toluene and xylene), respectively. The enhancing effects of hydrogen radicals on overall MTOAH performance are validated by cofeeding hydrogen donor benzene, which provides an additional route of methane activation apart from catalytic activation. (c) 2020 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available