4.7 Article

Weak Tradeoff and Strong Segmentation Among Plant Hydraulic Traits During Seasonal Variation in Four Woody Species

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.585674

Keywords

annual; embolism resistance; habitat partitioning; niche divergence; warm temperate zone; water relation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600313]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2015FY210200-11]
  3. Research Foundation of Qingdao Forest Ecosystem [11200005071603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plants may maintain long-term xylem function via efficiency-safety tradeoff and segmentation. Most studies focus on the growing season and community level. We studied species with different efficiency-safety tradeoff strategies, Quercus acutissima, Robinia pseudoacacia, Vitex negundo var. heterophylla, and Rhus typhina, to determine the seasonality of this mechanism. We separated their branches into perennial shoots and terminal twigs and monitored their midday water potential (psi(md)), relative water content (RWC), stem-specific hydraulic conductivity (K-s), loss of 12, 50, and 88% of maximum efficiency (i.e., P-12, P-50, P-88) for 2 years. There were no correlations between water relations (psi(md), RWC, K-s) and embolism resistance traits (P-12, P-50, P-88) but they significantly differed between the perennial shoots and terminal twigs. All species had weak annual hydraulic efficiency-safety tradeoff but strong segmentation between the perennial shoots and the terminal twigs. R. pseudoacacia used a high-efficiency, low-safety strategy, whereas R. typhina used a high-safety, low-efficiency strategy. Q. acutissima and V. negundo var. heterophylla alternated these strategies. This mechanism provides a potential basis for habitat partitioning and niche divergence in the changing warm temperate zone environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available