4.8 Article

Behavioral role of PACAP signaling reflects its selective distribution in glutamatergic and GABAergic neuronal subpopulations

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.61718

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [CB238744, CB283279]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH-IRP-1ZIAMH002386]
  3. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [IN216918, G1200121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PACAP, as a co-transmitter, increases neuronal excitability and may enhance anxiety and arousal associated with threat. Through studying the distribution of neurons expressing PACAP and PAC1 in the mouse nervous system, a coherent chemoanatomical picture of PACAP's role in brain motor responses to sensory input is developed.
The neuropeptide PACAP, acting as a co-transmitter, increases neuronal excitability, which may enhance anxiety and arousal associated with threat conveyed by multiple sensory modalities. The distribution of neurons expressing PACAP and its receptor, PAC1, throughout the mouse nervous system was determined, in register with expression of glutamatergic and GABAergic neuronal markers, to develop a coherent chemoanatomical picture of PACAP role in brain motor responses to sensory input. A circuit role for PACAP was tested by observing Fos activation of brain neurons after olfactory threat cue in wild-type and PACAP knockout mice. Neuronal activation and behavioral response, were blunted in PACAP knock-out mice, accompanied by sharply downregulated vesicular transporter expression in both GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons expressing PACAP and its receptor. This report signals a new perspective on the role of neuropeptide signaling in supporting excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in the nervous system within functionally coherent polysynaptic circuits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available