4.5 Article

Risk for overexploiting a seemingly stable seal population: influence of multiple stressors and hunting

Journal

ECOSPHERE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3343

Keywords

conservation; hunting; Phoca vitulina; population dynamics; strategy

Categories

Funding

  1. Viltforskningsanslaget
  2. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  3. BONUS program BaltHealth
  4. BONUS (Art. 185)
  5. Innovation Fund Denmark [6180-00001B, 6180-00002B]
  6. Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH
  7. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ 03F0767A]
  8. Academy of Finland [311966]
  9. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA)
  10. EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conservation efforts have focused on depleted marine mammal populations, but many have recovered to historical levels; new management strategies and models are needed for ecological risk assessment; a study on harbor seal metapopulation in Swedish and Danish waters shows that the population is close to carrying capacity and faces various future stressors.
Conservation efforts have mainly been focused on depleted species or populations, but many formerly reduced marine mammal populations have recovered to historical abundances. This calls for new management strategies and new models for ecological risk assessment that incorporate local density dependence and multiple environmental stressors. The harbor seal metapopulation in Swedish and Danish waters has increased from about 2500 to 25,000 over the past 40 yr. Trend analysis based on aerial survey data and somatic growth curves indicates that the population is close to carrying capacity. We performed a population viability analysis based on realistic life history parameters and investigated a range of potential scenarios caused by future stressors. If the population is able to resume its high intrinsic rate of increase at about 11% annually, when pushed down below carrying capacity, it can also sustain additional mortality such as modest hunting and infrequent epizootics. However, if xenobiotics will cause even a slight reduction in average fecundity, the population becomes significantly more vulnerable. In the absence of epizootics, and given full reproductive capacity, hunting of a few hundred animals annually is not harmful to the long-term persistence of the population. Nevertheless, a slight decrease in growth potential, for example, caused by exposure to endocrine disruptors, makes even limited hunting risky. Our study shows how an apparently stable and abundant marine mammal population can be close to a point of rapid population decline. Thus, careful monitoring of population size, growth rate, health, and exposure to xenobiotics as well as recording of the age and sex structure of the hunt is required to avoid repeating the history of overexploitation and another population collapse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available