4.3 Article

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection for Treatment of Non-Proliferative Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective, Randomized and Blinded Trial

Journal

CURRENT DRUG DELIVERY
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 825-832

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1567201817666201202093637

Keywords

Intravitreal; dexamethasone; ranibizumab; implant; injection; treatment; clinical trial; diabetic macular edema

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the safety and efficacy of intravitreal Ranibizumab injection and Dexamethasone implants in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Both treatments were found to be safe and effective in reducing CMT and improving BCVA at the 4-month follow up. Further randomized trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period are needed to validate these findings.
Introduction: In the working age population, Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual loss. Purpose: The present study is aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab (IVR) versus intravitreal Dexamethasone implant (IVD) in patients with DME in a tertiary care centre upto 4 months. Methods: This is a comparative, prospective, randomized study that was done on 140 patients with macular edema confirmed on optical coherence tomography (OCT). IVD group received Ozurdex (R) (Allergan, Inc, Ireland) while the IVR group received Lucentis (R) (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland); the groups were followed up at day-1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16. Patients were divided intoGroup A, in which patients were given 3 doses (monthly) of IVR 0.3 mg in 0.05 ml (n=70). Group B patients were given a single dose of IVD implant 0.7 mg (n=70). Results: The mean number of injections given was 1 Ozurdex (R) per patient vs. 3 Lucentis (R) per patient. The maximum reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) with IVD was 167.8 mu m and 138.8 mu m in the 2nd and 3rd months, respectively, with IVR. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the 4th month was 0.34 logMAR and 0.33 logMAR, in IVD and IVR groups, respectively, with consistent improvement. Patients with 0-5 letters, 6-10 letters and 10-15 letters, and >15 letters visibility in IVD group were 9.5, 20.6, 4.8, 6.4%, and 20.4, 18.8, 20.3 20.3% in IVR groups, respectively. The maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) rise with IVD was found to be 16 mmHg in 2 patients (3.17%). IOP rise >10 mmHg was observed in 14/63 patients (22.22%); the majority of patients indicated a high rise at 2nd month with all returning to baseline by 4th month. No reports of infectious endophthalmitis or new cataracts were detected in either of the treated groups. Conclusion: Both intravitreal Ranibizumab injection and Dexamethasone implants were found to be safe and effective in lowering CMT and improving BCVA at the 4-month follow up in patients with DME. Since there was no recurrence of CMT in the Dexamethasone implant group, we suggest that early administration before the 4 th month may indicate superior efficacy over the ranibizumab injection. Further randomized trials in a large sample size with a longer period follow-up would be performed to justify the obtained results in the present study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available