4.6 Article

Different methylation signatures at diagnosis in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myeloid leukemia predict azacitidine response and longer survival

Journal

CLINICAL EPIGENETICS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01002-y

Keywords

Myelodysplastic syndromes; Secondary acute myeloid leukemia; DNA methylation; Hypomethylating agents; Epigenetic drugs; Prognostic factors; Azacitidine

Funding

  1. Miniterio de Sanidad y Consumo, Spain [PI11/02519]
  2. Celgene Spain
  3. FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion - Agencia Estatal de Invsetigacion [RTI2018-094005-B-I00]
  4. MINECO-ISCIII [PIE16/00011]
  5. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie Stiftung [DJCLS 14R/2018]
  6. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [254/C/2019]
  7. La Caixa Foundation
  8. Fundacio Internacional Josep Carreras
  9. CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya
  10. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  11. AGAUR [2017-SGR-305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that altered DNA methylation patterns at specific CpG sites at diagnosis may serve as a biomarker for predicting the response to AZA and survival.
Background: Epigenetic therapy, using hypomethylating agents (HMA), is known to be effective in the treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, response rates to HMA are low and there is an unmet need in finding prognostic and predictive biomarkers of treatment response and overall survival. We performed global methylation analysis of 75 patients with high-risk MDS and secondary AML who were included in CETLAM SMD-09 protocol, in which patients received HMA or intensive treatment according to age, comorbidities and cytogenetic. Results: Unsupervised analysis of global methylation pattern at diagnosis did not allow patients to be differentiated according to the cytological subtype, cytogenetic groups, treatment response or patient outcome. However, after a supervised analysis we found a methylation signature defined by 200 probes, which allowed differentiating between patients responding and non-responding to azacitidine (AZA) treatment and a different methylation pattern also defined by 200 probes that allowed to differentiate patients according to their survival. On studying follow-up samples, we confirmed that AZA decreases global DNA methylation, but in our cohort the degree of methylation decrease did not correlate with the type of response. The methylation signature detected at diagnosis was not useful in treated samples to distinguish patients who were going to relapse or progress. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in a subset of specific CpGs, altered DNA methylation patterns at diagnosis may be useful as a biomarker for predicting AZA response and survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available