4.7 Article

Fecundity and the demographic strategies of coral morphologies

Journal

ECOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages 3485-3493

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1588

Keywords

demographic strategies; fecundity; morphology; reef coral; tradeoff

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT110100609, FT0990652, DP0880544]
  2. ERC [BioTIME 250189]
  3. Scottish Funding Council [MASTS - HR09011]
  4. Australian Research Council [FT0990652, FT110100609] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding species differences in demographic strategies is a fundamental goal of ecology. In scleractinian corals, colony morphology is tightly linked with many demographic traits, such as size-specific growth and morality. Here we test how well morphology predicts the colony size-fecundity relationship in eight species of broadcast-spawning corals. Variation in colony fecundity is greater among morphologies than between species with a similar morphology, demonstrating that colony morphology can be used as a quantitative proxy for demographic strategies. Additionally, we examine the relationship between size-specific colony fecundity and mechanical vulnerability (i.e., vulnerability to colony dislodgment). Interestingly, the relationship between size-specific fecundity and mechanical vulnerability varied among morphologies. For tabular species, the most fecund colonies are the most mechanically vulnerable, while the opposite is true for massive species. For corymbose and digitate colonies, mechanical vulnerability remains relatively constant as fecundity increases. These results reveal strong differences in the demographic tradeoffs among species of different morphologies. Using colony morphology as a quantitative proxy for demographic strategies can help predict coral community dynamics and responses to anthropogenic change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available