4.6 Article

Green Solvent Selection for Suzuki-Miyaura Coupling of Amides

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 552-559

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08044

Keywords

solvents; amide cleavage; amide activation; N-C(O) activation; Pd-NHCs; N-heterocyclic carbenes; Suzuki cross-coupling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32001930]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2020JQ-238]
  3. Young Talent Fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi [2019-02-02]
  4. Rutgers University
  5. NSF (CAREER) [CHE-1650766]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A range of environmentally friendly solvents were evaluated for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of amides, with i-PrOAc identified as the recommended solvent. Other alternative recommended solvents such as MTBE, CPME, DEC, p-cymene, DMC, and anisole were also suggested for the coupling process.
A range of environmentally friendly solvents was evaluated in the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of amides in an attempt to provide the first solvent selection guide for the powerful C-C coupling by amide bond cleavage. Of the 14 solvents and 10 Pd-NHC catalysts (NHC = N-heterocyclic carbene) considered, i-PrOAc was identified as the recommended, environmentally friendly solvent for the coupling. The obtained data permit an overall ranking of the recommended solvents in the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of amides, with methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE), cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), diethyl carbonate (DEC), p-cymene, dimethylcarbonate (DMC), and anisole as alternative recommended solvents in terms of health, safety, and environmental ranking for the coupling. The data should facilitate the replacement of hazardous solvents with green organic solvents in the biorelevant manifold of amide bond coupling for the further implementation of amide bond activation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available