4.6 Article

π-Extended Dihydrophenazine-Based Polymeric Cathode Material for High-Performance Organic Batteries

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 48, Pages 17868-17875

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07314

Keywords

organic batteries; battery cathode materials; multielectron; conjugated organics; dihydrophenazine derivatives; organic polymeric materials; organic synthesis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772199]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170329]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science Technology
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. 111 Project
  6. Joint International Research Laboratory of Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic electrode materials have attracted wide-spread attention as alternative candidates for lithium-ion batteries due to their potential for sustainable production, wide source, low cost, and adjustability. Herein, we develop a dihydrophenazine-based multielectron redox center to promote the energy and power density of organic batteries. The poly(1,3,5-tris(10-(4-vinylphenyl)phenazin-5(10H)-yl)benzene) (p-TPZB)-based battery shows a specific discharge capacity of 155 mAh g(-1) with a discharge voltage of 3.1-4.2 V (vs Li+/Li) initially. Until the 2000th cycle, the specific discharge capacity is still maintained up to 138 mAh g(-1), with an excellent capacity retention rate of ca. 89% at 2C. Meanwhile, the p-TPZBILi cell delivers outstanding power density and energy density up to 4320 W kg(-1) and 522 Wh kg(-1), respectively. Moreover, p-TPZB also has shown potential as an active material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). Our study provides a structure and strategy to improve the capacity and density of next-generation high-performance lithium/sodium-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available