4.3 Article

Silicon Supplied Via Roots or Leaves Relieves Potassium Deficiency in Maize Plants

Journal

SILICON
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 773-782

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-020-00908-1

Keywords

Abiotic stress; Beneficial element; Leaf chlorosis; Zea mays

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of silicon improved water use efficiency, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, and dry matter production in potassium-deficient maize plants, with a more noticeable effect when applied via the roots.
Purpose The aim of this study was to determine whether silicon (Si) supplied via nutrient solution or foliar spray is nutritionally and physiologically efficient in mitigating potassium (K) deficiency in maize plants. Methods To that end, an experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with maize plants grown in a hydroponic system. The treatments included two levels of K, i.e. K deficient (0.2 mmol L-1 of K) and K-sufficient (6 mmol L-1 of K). Under both these conditions, Si was supplied through stabilized potassium sodium silicate via nutrient solution (2 mmol L-1 of Si) or foliar spray (5.3 mmol L-1 of Si) and control (0 mmol L-1 of Si), using a completely randomized design and four repetitions. Results Potassium deficiency without the addition of Si showed less accumulation of K and Si and lower levels of photosynthetic pigments. It also caused the reduction in gas exchange and, consequently, a reduction in vegetative development. However, Si relieved K-deficiency stress in maize plants, since it improved nutritional, physiological and growth variables. Conclusion The application of Si to K-deficient maize plants improved their water use efficiency, their chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, and their dry matter production. This effect was more evident in the treatment of Si via roots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available