4.7 Review

Thermal Imaging for Plant Stress Detection and Phenotyping

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13010068

Keywords

Remote sensing; proximal sensing; thermography; plant phenotyping

Funding

  1. Junta de Andalucia [P12-AGR-0370]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (MCIU) by Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI)
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [RTI2018-094652-B-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, significant efforts have been made to develop new methods for optimizing stress detection in crop fields, with plant phenotyping based on imaging techniques becoming an essential tool in agriculture. Thermal imaging, particularly leaf temperature, is a valuable indicator of plant physiological status responsive to both biotic and abiotic stressors. When combined with other imaging sensors and data-mining techniques, thermography plays a crucial role in achieving more automated, precise, and sustainable agriculture.
In the last few years, large efforts have been made to develop new methods to optimize stress detection in crop fields. Thus, plant phenotyping based on imaging techniques has become an essential tool in agriculture. In particular, leaf temperature is a valuable indicator of the physiological status of plants, responding to both biotic and abiotic stressors. Often combined with other imaging sensors and data-mining techniques, thermography is crucial in the implementation of a more automatized, precise and sustainable agriculture. However, thermal data need some corrections related to the environmental and measuring conditions in order to achieve a correct interpretation of the data. This review focuses on the state of the art of thermography applied to the detection of biotic stress. The work will also revise the most important abiotic stress factors affecting the measurements as well as practical issues that need to be considered in order to implement this technique, particularly at the field scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available