4.7 Article

Nucleation Points: The Forgotten Parameter in the Synthesis of Hydrogel-Coated Gold Nanoparticles

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13030373

Keywords

nanoparticles; core-shell colloids; gold nanoparticles; poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM); hydrogel; seeded precipitation polymerization

Funding

  1. Sentinel North (SN) research program from Canada First Research Excellence Fund, through the SN project 3.8

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the importance of controlling the concentration of gold cores in the seeded precipitation polymerization process to achieve precise tuning of the encapsulation process. This principle can be extended to encapsulating cores composed of other materials, potentially impacting the development of stimuli-responsive smart materials.
The implementation of gold-hydrogel core-shell nanomaterials in novel light-driven technologies requires the development of well-controlled and scalable synthesis protocols with precisely tunable properties. Herein, new insights are presented concerning the importance of using the concentration of gold cores as a control parameter in the seeded precipitation polymerization process to modulate-regardless of core size-relevant fabrication parameters such as encapsulation yield, particle size and shrinkage capacity. Controlling the number of nucleation points results in the facile tuning of the encapsulation process, with yields reaching 99% of gold cores even when using different core sizes at a given particle concentration. This demonstration is extended to the encapsulation of bimodal gold core mixtures with equally precise control on the encapsulation yield, suggesting that this principle could be extended to encapsulating cores composed of other materials. These findings could have a significant impact on the development of stimuli-responsive smart materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available