4.5 Article

A randomized control trial of duloxetine and gabapentin in painful diabetic neuropathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 532-541

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13148

Keywords

duloxetine; gabapentin; painful diabetic neuropathy; RCT

Funding

  1. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both duloxetine and gabapentin showed similar efficacy in relieving symptomatic pain in painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) over a 12-week period, with no significant difference in improvement between the two drugs. Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most common, and the long-term efficacy and safety of the drugs were not assessed due to the short follow-up period.
Background To analyze the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and gabapentin in painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Methods A randomized, open-label, active control, 12-week trial was conducted. A total of 86 participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio into gabapentin 300 mg and duloxetine 60 mg groups. The primary efficacy objective was comparison of mean change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 points) scores between duloxetine and gabapentin. The symptom scores and adverse events were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: Statistically significant (P value<.001) improvement was observed in VAS scores in both duloxetine group and gabapentin group at 12 weeks as compared to baseline. However, no significant difference in VAS scores between duloxetine and gabapentin. Similar improvement in diabetic neuropathy symptoms (DNS), diabetic neuropathy examination (DNE), and neuropathic disability score (NDS) was observed in either group over 12 weeks. There were no significant differences in DNS (P = 0.578), DNE (P = 0.410), and NDS (P = 0.071) scores between the two treatment groups. The overall safety evaluation of both duloxetine and gabapentin were similar. The most common adverse events reported were gastrointestinal. Conclusion The results indicated that both drugs were effective for the symptomatic relief from PDN and had similar efficacy. Follow-up of patients was only for 12 weeks and therefore the long-term efficacy and safety of the study drugs could not be assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available