4.3 Article

Response to Flavored Cartridge/Pod-Based Product Ban among Adult JUUL Users: You Get Nicotine However You Can Get It

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010207

Keywords

electronic cigarette; perceptions; mixed methods research; flavored tobacco products; food and drug administration; disposable e-cigarettes; tobacco control policy

Funding

  1. Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute
  2. Penn State Social Science Research Institute
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR002014]
  4. Penn State College of Medicine Department of Psychiatry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a significant decrease in the use of mint pods and a significant increase in the use of menthol pods following the FDA ban. Qualitative data revealed themes such as switching from mint to menthol pods, refilling pods, and transitioning to other available products. Further research is needed to assess the impact of these behaviors on public health.
In order to curb increasing youth electronic cigarette (e-cig) use, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the sale of flavored cartridge/pod-based products in February 2020. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the impact of the FDA ban on adult JUUL users. The samples of current adult JUUL users were surveyed via Amazon Mechanical Turk at three time-points n = 76 (Sample 1); n = 128 (Sample 2); n = 86 (Sample 3) before and after the FDA flavored/pod ban. The participants were asked to report the JUUL flavored pod used most often and answer questions on purchasing generic pods or refilling (Quantitative). JUUL users were then interviewed in order to explore their perceptions and behaviors related to the FDA ban of flavored cartridge/pod-based products (Qualitative; n = 16). Quantitative data analysis evaluated the differences in variables by time-point. Qualitative data were coded into themes while using the constant comparative method. We found a significant decrease in the use of mint pods (43.4%, 22.7%, 16.3%) (p < 0.01), while there was a significant increase in the use of menthol pods (6.6%, 26.6%, 37.2%) (p < 0.01). Themes that emerged from the qualitative data included switching from mint to menthol pods, refilling pods, and switching to other products that are available in the desired flavors, such as generic pods or disposable e-cigs. Future research is needed in order to evaluate the impact of these behaviors on public health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available