4.3 Article

Epidemiologic Methods to Estimate Insufficient Sleep in the US Population

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249337

Keywords

sleep; sleep health; insufficient sleep; race; ethnicity; relative risk; logistic regression; Poisson regression; population-level estimates

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K07AG052685, K01HL135452, R01AG056531, R01MD007716, R01HL142066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the divergence in population-level estimates of insufficient sleep (<6 h) by examining the explanatory role of race/ethnicity and contrasting values derived from logistic and Poisson regression modeling techniques. We utilized National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data to test our hypotheses among 20-85 year-old non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White adults. We estimated the odds ratios using the transformed logistic regression and Poisson regression with robust variance relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of insufficient sleep. Comparing non-Hispanic White (10176) with non-Hispanic Black (4888) adults (mean age: 50.61 +/- 18.03 years, female: 50.8%), we observed that the proportion of insufficient sleepers among non-Hispanic Blacks (19.2-26.1%) was higher than among non-Hispanic Whites (8.9-13.7%) across all age groupings. The converted estimated relative risk ranged from 2.12 (95% CI: 1.59, 2.84) to 2.59 (95% CI: 1.92, 3.50), while the estimated relative risks derived directly from Poisson regression analysis ranged from 1.84 (95% CI: 1.49, 2.26) to 2.12 (95% CI: 1.64, 2.73). All analyses indicated a higher risk of insufficient sleep among non-Hispanic Blacks. However, the estimates derived from logistic regression modeling were considerably higher, suggesting the direct estimates of relative risk ascertained from Poisson regression modeling may be a preferred method for estimating population-level risk of insufficient sleep.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available