4.4 Article

Prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority clinical trial

Journal

INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 1047-1055

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.22756

Keywords

chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; evidence‐ based medicine; postoperative; quality of life; patient‐ reported outcome measure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that postoperative placebo is noninferior to prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in terms of postoperative sinonasal-specific quality of life (QOL). There were no significant differences in postoperative endoscopic scores or infection rates between the antibiotic and placebo groups, but the rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group.
Background Surgeons commonly prescribe prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), yet minimal data exist to support this practice. In this study we aimed to assess the impact of post-ESS antibiotics on infection, quality of life (QOL), and endoscopic scores. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial comparing amoxicillin-clavulanate vs placebo after ESS (NCT01919411, ClinicalTrials.gov). Adults (N = 77) with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to appropriate medical therapy who underwent ESS were randomized to antibiotics (N = 37) or placebo (N = 40) and followed clinically (mean +/- standard deviation: 1.3 +/- 0.3 and 8.8 +/- 3.9 weeks postoperatively). At baseline and follow-up, QOL was measured with 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaires and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance and z tests for proportions. Results Placebo was noninferior to antibiotic prophylaxis with regard to postoperative SNOT-22 scores (beta = 0.18, 2-tailed p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the antibiotic and placebo groups in LK score trajectories over time (p = 0.63) or in postoperative infection rates (2.6% vs 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.96). The rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group (24.3% vs 2.5%; relative risk = 10.8; p = 0.02). Conclusion Although statistically underpowered, the results suggest placebo was noninferior to prophylactic antibiotics after ESS for CRS regarding postoperative sinonasal-specific QOL. There were no significant differences in postoperative endoscopic scores or rates of infection, but the rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group. These findings add to the growing evidence that routine use of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics does not improve outcomes post-ESS and significantly increases the rate of diarrhea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available