4.8 Article

Failure to Degrade CAT-Tailed Proteins Disrupts Neuronal Morphogenesis and Cell Survival

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108599

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. AMED [JP 19gm1110010]
  2. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI [JP18H03977, JP 19H05281, JP16K07243, JP20K06615]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  5. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  6. Suzuken Memorial Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosome-associated quality control modifies nascent polypeptide chains, promoting their degradation, which is essential for proper neuronal morphogenesis and cell survival. However, the mechanism and cytotoxicity of the C-terminal CAT tail in mammals remain unclear.
Ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) relieves stalled ribosomes and eliminates potentially toxic nascent polypeptide chains (NCs) that can cause neurodegeneration. During RQC, RQC2 modifies NCs with a C-terminal alanine and threonine (CAT) tail. CAT tailing promotes ubiquitination of NCs for proteasomal degradation, while RQC failure in budding yeast disrupts proteostasis via CAT-tailed NC aggregation. However, the CAT tail and its cytotoxicity in mammals have remained largely uncharacterized. We demonstrate that NEMF, a mammalian RQC2 homolog, modifies translation products of nonstop mRNAs, major erroneous mRNAs in mammals, with a C-terminal tail mainly composed of alanine with several other amino acids. Overproduction of nonstop mRNAs induces NC aggregation and caspase-3-dependent apoptosis and impairs neuronal morphogenesis, which are ameliorated by NEMF depletion. Moreover, we found that homopolymeric alanine tailing at least partially accounts for CAT-tail cytotoxicity. These findings explain the cytotoxicity of CAT-tailed NCs and demonstrate physiological significance of RQC on proper neuronal morphogenesis and cell survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available