4.8 Article

Enhancement versus neutralization by SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from a convalescent donor associates with distinct epitopes on the RBD

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108699

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31872730, 32070947, 81822045, 82041025]
  2. COVID-19 Prevention and Control Technology Project of Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province [2020C31001, 2020C31002]
  3. Municipal Science and Technology Plan Project of Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province [2016C11001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that neutralizing and ADE abilities of human SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are correlated with non-overlapping RBD epitopes they target.
Several potent neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) virus have been identified. However, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has not been comprehensively studied for SARS-CoV-2, and the relationship between enhancing versus neutralizing activities and antibody epitopes remains unknown. Here, we select a convalescent individual with potent IgG neutralizing activity and characterize his antibody response. Monoclonal antibodies isolated from memory B cells target four groups of five non-overlapping receptor-binding domain (RBD) epitopes. Antibodies to one group of these RBD epitopes mediate ADE of entry in Raji cells via an Fcg receptor-dependent mechanism. In contrast, antibodies targeting two other distinct epitope groups neutralize SARS-CoV-2 without ADE, while antibodies against the fourth epitope group are poorly neutralizing. One antibody, XG014, potently crossneutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as SARS-CoV-1, with respective IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) values as low as 5.1 and 23.7 ng/mL, while not exhibiting ADE. Therefore, neutralization and ADE of human SARS-CoV-2 antibodies correlate with non-overlapping RBD epitopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available