4.5 Review

Systemic Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea: Literature Review and Expert Opinion

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 291-300

Publisher

KOREAN CANCER ASSOCIATION
DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.1233

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumor; Lanreotide; Octreotide; Everolimus; Sunitinib; Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; Capecitabine; Temozolomide

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroendocrine tumors are malignancies that commonly arise from the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas, with curative resection being the main treatment for localized disease. Systemic therapy is necessary for relapsed or metastatic/unresectable cases. Specific guidelines for Korean patients have been developed considering geographical discrepancies and medical practices. Various treatment options including somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies, peptide receptor radionuclide treatments, and cytotoxic chemotherapies are addressed in the consensus review.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of malignancies arising from neuroendocrine cells and frequently originate in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Although curative resection is the main treatment for localized disease, systemic therapy is needed for relapsed or metastatic/unresectable gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs). Although there are several NET treatment guidelines from various countries, the geographical discrepancies between patient clinical characteristics, the regulatory approval status for therapeutic agents, and medical practices necessitate specific guidelines for Korean patients. We here provide a consensus review of the diagnosis, staging and systemic treatment of Korean GEP-NET patients. Systemic therapy options and the current Korean expert consensus on these treatments, including somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies such as everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide treatments, and cytotoxic chemotherapies are addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available