4.4 Article

Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using the MizCure perineometer

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Urology & Nephrology

Reliability and validity of intravaginal pressure measurements with a new intravaginal pressure device: The FemFit®

Licia P. Cacciari et al.

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS (2020)

Article Anesthesiology

Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation

Patrick Schober et al.

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2018)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women

Chantale Dumoulin et al.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)

Article Biophysics

Novel instrumented probe for measuring 3D pressure distribution along the vaginal canal

Licia P. Cacciari et al.

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS (2017)

Article Rehabilitation

A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

Terry K. Koo et al.

JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE (2016)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women

Dulcegleika V. B. Sartori et al.

BMC UROLOGY (2015)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Pelvic floor awareness and the positive effect of verbal instructions in 958 women early postdelivery

Alexandra Vermandel et al.

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2015)

Article Rehabilitation

Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer

Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira et al.

PHYSIOTHERAPY (2011)

Article Rehabilitation

Application of perineometer in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance: A reliability study

Nahid Rahmani et al.

JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES (2011)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

Ingeborg Hoff Braekken et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2010)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

COMPARISON BETWEEN MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED WITH THREE DIFFERENT PERINEOMETERS

Patricia Brentegani Barbosa et al.

CLINICS (2009)

Article Acoustics

Validation of new ultrasound parameters for quantifying pelvic floor muscle contraction

S. -H. Yang et al.

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2009)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools

HC Frawley et al.

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS (2006)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Pelvic floor muscle evaluation in incontinent patients

JL Amaro et al.

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2005)

Article Urology & Nephrology

The vaginal pressure profile

NM Guaderrama et al.

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS (2005)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Pelvic floor maximal strength using vaginal digital assessment compared to dynamometric measurements

M Morin et al.

NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS (2004)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Is there any difference in measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength in supine and standing position?

K Bo et al.

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2003)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure

P Neumann et al.

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION (2002)