4.7 Article

Enhancement of Anticancer Efficacy and Tumor Penetration of Sorafenib by Ionic Liquids

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202001455

Keywords

apoptosis; cell cycles; exocytosis; ionic liquids; penetration; sorafenib

Funding

  1. School of Engineering & Applied Sciences at Harvard University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of CAGE with SRF can enhance the anti-cancer effect of the drug by inhibiting exocytosis and improving intracellular retention, leading to up to fivefold increase in effectiveness. Additionally, CAGE enhances the penetration of SRF into multicellular constructs with multiple mechanisms involved, offering a novel therapy for inhibiting tumor progression.
Ionic liquids (ILs) possess unique solvation and biological properties for drug delivery. Choline and geranic acid (CAGE) in particular, has been successfully formulated to orally deliver insulin and hydrophobic therapeutics such as sorafenib (SRF). However, relatively little is known about the effect of CAGE on intracellular delivery of drugs. Here the effect of low-concentration CAGE (<2 mg mL(-1)) on the delivery of SRF into cancer cells (4T1, PANC-1, and HT29) as well as intestine epithelium cells (Caco-2) is studied. The anti-cancer effect of SRF is enhanced by up to fivefold in the presence of CAGE (0.5 mg mL(-1)). The effect is mediated not by enhancing the cellular uptake of SRF but by improving intracellular SRF retention by inhibiting exocytosis. Moreover, CAGE improves the anti-tumor effect of SRF by increasing apoptosis and blocking cell-cycle progression. Moreover, CAGE significantly enhances the penetration of SRF into and across multicellular constructs with multiple mechanisms involved. Collectively, the administration of ILs such as CAGE combined with SRF may offer a novel therapy to better inhibit tumor progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available