4.7 Article

Physical Bond Breaking in Associating Copolymer Liquids

Journal

ACS MACRO LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 122-128

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00697

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, through the Materials Research Laboratory at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [DE-SC0020858]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By combining concepts from polymer and glassy liquid physics, a new model has been constructed to describe the bond-breaking time scale of attractive sticker groups in associating copolymer liquids. The model suggests that the activated event is a two-step process involving the release of dynamic caging constraints and the attractive stickers surmounting a free-energy barrier. This model provides a consistent description for diverse polymer chemistries and architectures, while existing phenomenological models show qualitative failures.
We combine ideas from polymer and glassy liquid physics to construct a new model for the bond-breaking time scale of attractive sticker groups in associating copolymer liquids that form transient networks. The activated event is argued to be a two-step process, involving first the release of the nonsticker dynamic caging constraints that defines the primary alpha relaxation, followed by attractive stickers surmounting an association free-energy barrier subject to a local frictional resistance which can be strongly affected by relaxation-diffusion decoupling. The ideas embedded in the model produce a consistent and good description of the bond-breaking time scale for diverse polymer chemistries and architectures as a function of temperature and fraction of sticky groups. Chemically sensible values for association free energies are deduced. In strong contrast, the existing phenomenological models are shown to incur qualitative failures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available