4.6 Article

A framework for constructing and evaluating the role of MR as a holographic virtual guide in museums

Journal

VIRTUAL REALITY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 895-918

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-020-00497-9

Keywords

Mixed reality; Virtual guide; Museums; Holographic system; Microsoft HoloLens

Funding

  1. Newton-Mosharafa scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aims to reshape the museum experience by introducing MR technology to enhance visitor interaction and experience, and evaluates the potential applications of MR guidance systems in museums. The results suggest that MR technology may have significant potential future applications in museums, enhancing the economic state of museums.
Mixed reality (MR) is a cutting-edge technology at the forefront of many new applications in the tourism and cultural heritage sector. This study aims to reshape the museum experience by creating a highly engaging and immersive museum experience for visitors combing real-time visual, audio information and computer-generated images with museum artefacts and customer displays. This research introduces a theoretical framework that assesses the potential of MR guidance system in usefulness, ease of use, enjoyment, interactivity, touring and future applications. The evaluation introduces the MuseumEye MR application in the Egyptian Museum, Cairo using mixed method surveys and a sample of 171 participants. The results of the questionnaire highlighted the importance of the mediating the role of the tour guide in enhancing the relationship between perceived usefulness, ease of use, multimedia, UI design, interactivity and the intention of use. Furthermore, the results of this study revealed the potential future use of MR in museums and ensured sustainability and engagement past the traditional visitor museum experience, which heightens the economic state of museums and cultural heritage sectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available