4.7 Article

Tropical rhodolith beds are a major and belittled reef fish habitat

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80574-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brazil's Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico through its Long-Term Ecological Research program (PELD)
  2. Fundacao RENOVA
  3. CNPq
  4. CAPES/IODP
  5. FAPERJ
  6. FAPES
  7. Instituto Linha D'Agua

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that fish assemblages in the most biodiverse region of the Southwestern Atlantic are mainly influenced by two major hard-bottom megahabitats and the amount of light reaching the bottom. Rhodolith beds, a dominant benthic megahabitat in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic shelf, play an underrated role as fish habitats and must be considered in conservation planning.
Understanding habitat-level variation in community structure provides an informed basis for natural resources' management. Reef fishes are a major component of tropical marine biodiversity, but their abundance and distribution are poorly assessed beyond conventional SCUBA diving depths. Based on a baited-video survey of fish assemblages in Southwestern Atlantic's most biodiverse region we show that species composition responded mainly to the two major hard-bottom megahabitats (reefs and rhodolith beds) and to the amount of light reaching the bottom. Both megahabitats encompassed typical reef fish assemblages but, unexpectedly, richness in rhodolith beds and reefs was equivalent. The dissimilar fish biomass and trophic structure in reefs and rhodolith beds indicates that these systems function based on contrasting energy pathways, such as the much lower herbivory recorded in the latter. Rhodolith beds, the dominant benthic megahabitat in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic shelf, play an underrated role as fish habitats, and it is critical that they are considered in conservation planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available