4.7 Article

Phanerozoic radiation of ammonia oxidizing bacteria

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81718-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agouron Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Simons Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship in Marine Microbial Ecology
  3. NSF XSEDE Startup Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that bacterial ammonia oxidation is relatively young, originating later than previously thought and coinciding with the widespread oxygenation of the deep ocean. It has significant implications for understanding the importance of nutrient cycles and challenges earlier interpretations of ancient nitrogen isotope records.
The modern nitrogen cycle consists of a web of microbially mediated redox transformations. Among the most crucial reactions in this cycle is the oxidation of ammonia to nitrite, an obligately aerobic process performed by a limited number of lineages of bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA). As this process has an absolute requirement for O-2, the timing of its evolution-especially as it relates to the Great Oxygenation Event similar to 2.3 billion years ago-remains contested and is pivotal to our understanding of nutrient cycles. To estimate the antiquity of bacterial ammonia oxidation, we performed phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses of AOB. Surprisingly, bacterial ammonia oxidation appears quite young, with crown group clades having originated during Neoproterozoic time (or later) with major radiations occurring during Paleozoic time. These results place the evolution of AOB broadly coincident with the pervasive oxygenation of the deep ocean. The late evolution AOB challenges earlier interpretations of the ancient nitrogen isotope record, predicts a more substantial role for AOA during Precambrian time, and may have implications for understanding of the size and structure of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle through geologic time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available