4.7 Article

An atypical and functionally diverse family of Kunitz-type cysteine/serine proteinase inhibitors secreted by the helminth parasite Fasciola hepatica

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77687-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department for Employment and Learning (DEL), Northern Ireland grant
  2. European Research Council Advanced Grant (HELIVAC) [322725]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Professorship grant [17/RP/5368]
  4. Horizon 2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fasciola hepatica is a global parasite of humans and their livestock. Regulation of parasite-secreted cathepsin L-like cysteine proteases associated with virulence is important to fine-tune parasite-host interaction. We uncovered a family of seven Kunitz-type (FhKT) inhibitors dispersed into five phylogenetic groups. The most highly expressed FhKT genes (group FhKT1) are secreted by the newly excysted juveniles (NEJs), the stage responsible for host infection. The FhKT1 inhibitors do not inhibit serine proteases but are potent inhibitors of parasite cathepsins L and host lysosomal cathepsin L, S and K cysteine proteases (inhibition constants<10 nM). Their unusual inhibitory properties are due to (a) Leu(15) in the reactive site loop P1 position that sits at the water-exposed interface of the S1 and S1 subsites of the cathepsin protease, and (b) Arg(19) which forms cation-pi interactions with Trp(291) of the S1 ' subsite and electrostatic interactions with Asp(125) of the S2 ' subsite. FhKT1.3 is exceptional, however, as it also inhibits the serine protease trypsin due to replacement of the P1 Leu(15) in the reactive loop with Arg(15). The atypical Kunitz-type inhibitor family likely regulate parasite cathepsin L proteases and/or impairs host immune cell activation by blocking lysosomal cathepsin proteases involved in antigen processing and presentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available