4.7 Article

Preliminary clinical experience applying donor-derived cell-free DNA to discern rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80845-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Clinical and Fundamental Research on Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [15411950401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested 76 pediatric liver transplant patients and found that dd-cfDNA has good sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing rejection. The performance of dd-cfDNA differed between rejection patients and those with EBV/CMV infection and DILI.
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been of major interest recently as a non-invasive marker of graft injury, but has not yet been extensively tested in children. From May to September in 2019, a total of 76 pediatric patients receiving a liver graft were enrolled and there were 27 patients excluded. Ultimately plasma samples and matched liver specimens from 49 patients were successfully collected whenever rejection was suspected clinically. Dd-cfDNA were analyzed and then compared to biopsy. Of these, 11 (22.4%) patients were found to have rejection by biopsy. Dd-cfDNA levels were higher among patients with rejection compared to those with no rejection. In subgroup analysis, dd-cfDNA% among patients with rejection differed from those with EBV/CMV infection and DILI patients. Similarly, observations were available concerning dd-cfDNA (cp/mL). The AUC for dd-cfDNA% and dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) were 0.878, 0.841, respectively, both of which were higher than conventional LFTs. For rejection, dd-cfDNA% >= 28.7% yielded a sensitivity of 72.7%, specificity 94.7% and dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) >= 2076 cp/mL, yielded a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity 81.9%. Of note, the dd-cfDNA distribution was significantly different between whole liver and LLS transplantation. In the setting of pediatric LTx, dd-cfDNA appears to be a sensitive biomarker indicating the presence of rejection.International Clinical Trails Registry Platform: ChiCTR1900022406.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available