4.7 Article

Identification of ancestry proportions in admixed groups across the Americas using clinical pharmacogenomic SNP panels

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80389-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Sven and Lilly Lawski's Foundation [N2019-0040, N2020-0001]
  3. Brazilian agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  4. Brazilian agency Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the Preemptive PGx and DMET panels performed better in capturing individual admixture proportions in recently mixed populations in the Americas, providing reliable information on biogeographical ancestry and guiding the implementation of individualized genomic clinical decision support tools. Additionally, these panels can help control for population stratification effects in association studies in recently admixed populations, as demonstrated in a warfarin dosing GWA study in a sample from Brazil.
We evaluated the performance of three PGx panels to estimate biogeographical ancestry: the DMET panel, and the VIP and Preemptive PGx panels described in the literature. Our analysis indicate that the three panels capture quite well the individual variation in admixture proportions observed in recently admixed populations throughout the Americas, with the Preemptive PGx and DMET panels performing better than the VIP panel. We show that these panels provide reliable information about biogeographic ancestry and can be used to guide the implementation of PGx clinical decision-support (CDS) tools. We also report that using these panels it is possible to control for the effects of population stratification in association studies in recently admixed populations, as exemplified with a warfarin dosing GWA study in a sample from Brazil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available