4.7 Article

Metagenomic analysis of the cow, sheep, reindeer and red deer rumen

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81668-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Higher Education Council of the Turkish Republic
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBSRC: BB/P013759/1, BB/P013732/1, BB/J004235/1, BB/J004243/1]
  3. Technology Strategy Board [TS/J000108/1, TS/J000116/1]
  4. Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) of the Scottish Government
  5. BBSRC [BB/J016608/1, BB/S006680/1, BBS/E/D/30002276, BB/R015023/1, BB/N016742/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rumen microbiota in ruminants play a vital role in nutrition and offer potential for industrial applications. Variations were found in microbial taxonomy, enzyme genes, and KEGG orthologs among different ruminant species, highlighting the diversity of rumen microbiomes.
The rumen microbiota comprises a community of microorganisms which specialise in the degradation of complex carbohydrates from plant-based feed. These microbes play a highly important role in ruminant nutrition and could also act as sources of industrially useful enzymes. In this study, we performed a metagenomic analysis of samples taken from the ruminal contents of cow (Bos Taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). We constructed 391 metagenome-assembled genomes originating from 16 microbial phyla. We compared our genomes to other publically available microbial genomes and found that they contained 279 novel species. We also found significant differences between the microbiota of different ruminant species in terms of the abundance of microbial taxonomies, carbohydrate-active enzyme genes and KEGG orthologs. We present a dataset of rumen-derived genomes which in combination with other publicly-available rumen genomes can be used as a reference dataset in future metagenomic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available