Rats sniff out pulmonary tuberculosis from sputum: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis

In Sub-Saharan Africa, African giant pouched rats (Cricetomys gambianus) are trained to identify TB patients by smelling sputum. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the data to see if this novel method is comparable to traditional laboratory screening and detection methods like Ziehl-Neelsen stain-based assays (ZN) and bacterial culture. The search and data processing strategy is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019123629). Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for the keywords pouched rat and tuberculosis. Data from 53,181 samples obtained from 24,600 patients were extracted from seven studies. Using sample-wise detection, the sensitivity of the studies was 86.7% [95% CI 80.4-91.2%], while the specificity was 88.4% [95% CI 79.7-93.7%]. For patient-wise detection, the sensitivity was 81.3% [95% CI 64.0-91.4%], while the specificity was 73.4% [95% CI 62.8-81.9%]. Good and excellent classification was assessed by hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic analysis for patient-wise and sample-wise detections, respectively. Our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the above relatively inexpensive and rapid screening method. The results indicate that African giant pouched rats can discriminate healthy controls from TB individuals by sniffing sputum with even a higher accuracy than a single ZN screening.

Automated summary

By using African giant pouched rats to sniff sputum and identify TB patients, the method shows high sensitivity and specificity at the sample level, outperforming a single ZN screening. Although the sensitivity is slightly lower at the patient level, the rats are still able to effectively differentiate between healthy individuals and TB patients.