4.7 Article

Towards integration of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET-CT and MRI with mathematical modeling to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+breast cancer

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77397-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [753878]
  2. National Cancer Institute [U01CA174706, U24CA226110, U01CA142565, R01CA186193, P30CA033572]
  3. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [CPRIT RR160005]
  4. American Association of Physicists in Medicine
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [753878] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While targeted therapies exist for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer, HER2+patients do not always respond to therapy. We present the results of utilizing a biophysical mathematical model to predict tumor response for two HER2+breast cancer patients treated with the same therapeutic regimen but who achieved different treatment outcomes. Quantitative data from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Cu-64-DOTA-trastuzumab positron emission tomography (PET) are used to estimate tumor density, perfusion, and distribution of HER2-targeted antibodies for each individual patient. MRI and PET data are collected prior to therapy, and follow-up MRI scans are acquired at a midpoint in therapy. Given these data types, we align the data sets to a common image space to enable model calibration. Once the model is parameterized with these data, we forecast treatment response with and without HER2-targeted therapy. By incorporating targeted therapy into the model, the resulting predictions are able to distinguish between the two different patient responses, increasing the difference in tumor volume change between the two patients by>40%. This work provides a proof-of-concept strategy for processing and integrating PET and MRI modalities into a predictive, clinical-mathematical framework to provide patient-specific predictions of HER2+treatment response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available